Project haven sc2 losing points plus#
Project haven sc2 losing points free#

Project haven sc2 losing points plus#

Plus it allows us to ignore the silliness of assassination via voodoo over lightyears, which you can handwave by it being the non-canon path. So letting them rot to turn on Tosh always felt wrong.

Project haven sc2 losing points free#

It's possible that control was broken when Amon was banished, but remember that Moebius terrans weren't directly controlled by Amon, but rather enslaved by his hybrid, which as far as we know wouldn't have lost control over their thralls just because Amon left (and also wouldn't have just dropped dead).īut I think taken in isolation the spectres are just more sensible: Tosh hasn't done anything other than be a bit shady, and New Folsom, as Horner shows, holds a planetary prison worth idealist and free thinker who rebelled against Mengsk. We also have some (albeit non-canon) bits in Co-op implying Moebius was making more spectres, given the facilities in Cradle of Death. Sort of, but remember spectres join Raynor in the epilogue campaign, which strongly implies that it wasn't all of them. 's implied that the Specters eventually betray you and turn to Amon's side because of the stuff. Plus with Haven's Fall it's strongly implies you keep the non-infested colonists alive, which seemed like the most sensible choie. However, I do think that I would have gone with the protoss one, given Raynor's past with them and how he knows infestation is a losing battle when it comes to 'curing' it. So, what did you guys pick? What's the internet consensus?Ĭanonically, the choices are side with Tosh, side with Hanson and detonate the Char tunnels. Would still pick them, though, even with the risk, because I actually really like Tosh. I mean, I still picked Specter on my first playthrough, but I didn't know. You don't see it, of course, because you barely encounter the Dominion in the Protoss Campaign, but I feel it's probably a pretty safe bet when you consider what happens to the Mobius Foundation, and the fact that the Dominion spends the majority of the Protoss Campaign fighting them off. I'd like to think it's a clear enough danger that it's implied that the Specters eventually betray you and turn to Amon's side because of the stuff. I mean, it's not a sure-fire bet, though, considering that the Tal-Darim eventually join your side despite being constantly high on the stuff, but the potential is there. You know, the breath of creation? That stuff that allows Amon to whisper things to you and potentially control you? Yeah, that stuff.

On the other hand, though, if you're thinking long term, you want to kill the Specters, not unleash them. Not only that, but the in-between mission cinematic has a far better emotional payoff, what with Matt's talk about political prisoners and a better future, while the other side is a voodoo slapstick routine. What about you? Which did you pick on your first playthrough?īonus Question: Did you pick Specters or Ghosts? On the one hand, you pick Specters, you're picking the side that's been loyal to you, and not one of Mingsk's dogs. Seriously, from a purely practical position, the choice is very clear, at least for me. Her stance is understandable, she wants to save her people, which is a noble goal, but the zerg have been around for years, what makes her think that she could cure infestation in the short time she had before the zerg in those colonies became too difficult to contain? I mean, eventually you learn of a way to de-zergify terrens, but that requires an ancient alien piece of tech, and a huge amount of build-up time. The question I wanted to ask is which you picked during your first play through? Because I don't know about you, but I went with the Protoss. I've played both, and I know how it goes down either way. Now, this isn't a question over which is better.